<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/</loc><changefreq>hourly</changefreq><lastmod>2010-01-29T10:46:56Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/359766442/off-topic-supremes-declare-that-khadr-deprived-of</loc><lastmod>2010-01-29T15:47:01Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/352770989/a-myriad-of-gene-patents</loc><lastmod>2010-01-25T16:31:21Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/346453659/legal-privilege-extends-to-us-patent-attorneys</loc><lastmod>2010-01-21T21:30:37Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/346069973/ipic-analyzes-singapore-treaty-report</loc><lastmod>2010-01-21T15:32:19Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/334705940/singapore-and-madrid-major-changes-to-canadian</loc><lastmod>2010-01-14T22:29:28Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/332458890/cba-quarterly-case-summmaries</loc><lastmod>2010-01-13T15:03:57Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/328881013/the-jury-in-the-i4i-v-microsoft-case-speaks</loc><lastmod>2010-01-11T15:53:15Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/328833821/cipo-practice-notice-extra-6-months-only-in-tm</loc><lastmod>2010-01-11T15:09:29Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/323817180/patent-lawsuit-an-admission-of-commercial-defeat</loc><lastmod>2010-01-08T20:48:45Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/321056712/a-patent-flame-war-on-ipwatchdog-com</loc><lastmod>2010-01-07T05:45:37Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/318203398/article-on-the-federal-court-rule-change-re-hot-tubbing</loc><lastmod>2010-01-05T15:18:58Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/306799593/summary-judgment-rule-change</loc><lastmod>2009-12-29T22:03:43Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/306767682/two-holiday-dot-ca-decisions</loc><lastmod>2009-12-29T21:39:40Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/306757290/vancouver-twenty-ten</loc><lastmod>2009-12-29T21:31:48Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/277920231/hst-and-patent-royalties</loc><lastmod>2009-12-10T21:00:08Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/276607138/package-1-of-the-new-patent-rules-comes-in-to-effect</loc><lastmod>2009-12-09T22:27:35Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/273557514/redbrickpizza-ca-transferred</loc><lastmod>2009-12-07T20:38:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/269334958/revised-mopop-chapters-a-first-look</loc><lastmod>2009-12-04T19:43:17Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/269245274/cipo-issues-final-revised-mopop-chapters</loc><lastmod>2009-12-04T17:55:08Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/269170850/amazon-1-click-appeal-memo</loc><lastmod>2009-12-04T16:29:55Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/268095616/rim-facing-prospect-of-itc-import-ban</loc><lastmod>2009-12-03T21:44:05Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/267917378/please-stop-the-theatrical-swaying-of-your-glasses</loc><lastmod>2009-12-03T18:30:31Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/246311806/hot-tubbing-experts</loc><lastmod>2009-11-16T20:29:37Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/246082203/mopop-update-to-chapter-9-descriptions</loc><lastmod>2009-11-16T15:28:38Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/242758546/2009-patent-agent-exams-marking-guides</loc><lastmod>2009-11-13T18:19:53Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/239228381/bilski-oral-argument-transcript-dated-november-9-2009</loc><lastmod>2009-11-10T15:55:46Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/239200117/repeal-of-timber-marking-legislation</loc><lastmod>2009-11-10T15:14:50Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/238157125/bilski-oral-arguments</loc><lastmod>2009-11-09T15:57:17Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/236178728/obviousness-practice-notice</loc><lastmod>2009-11-07T19:02:13Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/221291596/bill-c-55-who-can-use-licensed-ip-after-bankruptcy</loc><lastmod>2009-10-23T22:49:37Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/220240131/supreme-court-denies-eli-lillys-evista-appeal</loc><lastmod>2009-10-22T20:08:19Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/214839395/westkelowna-ca-no-transfer-ordered</loc><lastmod>2009-10-16T17:52:43Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/212158201/developments-in-conflicts-law</loc><lastmod>2009-10-13T19:00:47Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/206795757/new-trade-mark-w-s-manual-much-more-detailed</loc><lastmod>2009-10-07T16:25:53Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/206745801/the-belzberg-decision-fca-critical-of-endless-patent</loc><lastmod>2009-10-07T15:03:09Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/205929026/intensive-revision-to-the-wares-and-services-manual</loc><lastmod>2009-10-06T15:36:30Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/205061504/federal-court-motions-new-online-tools</loc><lastmod>2009-10-05T13:58:09Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/203498791/purple-and-proud-homecoming-at-my-alma-mater</loc><lastmod>2009-10-03T17:32:25Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/201971383/happy-20th-birthday-to-the-new-patent-act</loc><lastmod>2009-10-01T19:58:29Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/200473943/gardiner-roberts-llp-picks-up-hitchman-and-others</loc><lastmod>2009-09-29T23:52:19Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/200086940/david-kappos-director-of-the-uspto-and-previously</loc><lastmod>2009-09-29T13:32:49Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/199252696/next-patent-agent-exam-sitting-april-2010</loc><lastmod>2009-09-28T15:51:05Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/196018555/disclosure-dos-and-donts</loc><lastmod>2009-09-24T20:04:04Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/195320880/2-of-2-in-the-microsoft-v-i4i-appeal</loc><lastmod>2009-09-23T23:01:34Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/195320478/september-23-2009-oral-argument-1-of-2-in-the</loc><lastmod>2009-09-23T23:00:54Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/195107173/i-for-an-i</loc><lastmod>2009-09-23T17:17:42Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/190445524/coors-light-v-kokanee</loc><lastmod>2009-09-17T20:57:06Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/187689125/amazon-1-click-patent-under-appeal</loc><lastmod>2009-09-14T14:03:35Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/183917079/id-like-to-thank-everyone-in-the-apple-community</loc><lastmod>2009-09-09T20:54:50Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/179047123/canadian-and-us-patent-agent-licensing-requirements-a</loc><lastmod>2009-09-03T21:05:01Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/179036394/red-baron-lime-v-bud-light-lime</loc><lastmod>2009-09-03T20:48:57Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/177189045/the-question-presented-in-this-case-is-whether</loc><lastmod>2009-09-01T16:19:19Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/177135733/cba-quarterly-case-summaries</loc><lastmod>2009-09-01T14:46:51Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/176389387/brick-brewing-lime</loc><lastmod>2009-08-31T17:44:55Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/176386694/the-french-word-for-patent-is-brevet-from</loc><lastmod>2009-08-31T17:40:27Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/176276190/changes-to-the-canadian-patent-exam</loc><lastmod>2009-08-31T14:39:20Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/176255046/microsoft-appeals-judgment-in-i4i-patent</loc><lastmod>2009-08-31T14:04:48Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/167538418/lawyers-are-challenging-the-jurisdiction-of-judges</loc><lastmod>2009-08-20T19:43:08Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/167393505/first-ever-reported-canadian-patent-trial</loc><lastmod>2009-08-20T15:49:41Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/166767555/mercks-singulair-patent-valid-in-the-us</loc><lastmod>2009-08-19T21:11:39Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/164987069/link-microsoft-word-case-courts-full-opinion</loc><lastmod>2009-08-17T16:51:42Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/161341894/toronto-based-company-wins-permanent-injunction-against</loc><lastmod>2009-08-12T15:55:42Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/160716627/obama-on-generic-drugs</loc><lastmod>2009-08-11T19:35:05Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/160006351/ip-development-co-interview-in-the-globe-mail</loc><lastmod>2009-08-10T20:17:25Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/158043363/link-a-refreshing-us-approach-to-maintenance-fee</loc><lastmod>2009-08-07T18:25:06Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/157912124/welcome-to-ipatents-ca-a-new-micro-blog</loc><lastmod>2009-08-07T14:05:26Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>http://ipatents.ca/post/157413893/small-business-and-patents-trademarks</loc><lastmod>2009-08-06T21:16:54Z</lastmod></url></urlset>
